0.00/0.03	% Problem  : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.00/0.05	% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM
0.11/0.37	% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
0.11/0.37	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.11/0.37	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.11/0.37	% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
0.11/0.37	% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
0.11/0.37	% CPULimit : 1440
0.11/0.37	% WCLimit  : 180
0.11/0.37	% DateTime : Mon Jul 27 14:12:36 UTC 2026
0.11/0.38	% CPUTime  : 
0.11/0.38	Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM
0.11/0.42	Running higher-order theorem proving
0.11/0.46	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.NwdA2qfTXN/E---3.1_1369188.p
2.00/1.08	% Version: 3.5.1-ho
2.00/1.08	% Preprocessing class: HSLMSMSSLLLCHSA.
2.00/1.08	% Scheduled 6 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
2.00/1.08	% Starting lpo1_fix with 540s (3) cores
2.00/1.08	% Starting full_lambda_9 with 180s (1) cores
2.00/1.08	% Starting almost_fo_4 with 180s (1) cores
2.00/1.08	% Starting new_ho_9 with 180s (1) cores
2.00/1.08	% Starting pre_casc_4 with 180s (1) cores
2.00/1.08	% Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 180s (1) cores
2.00/1.08	% lpo1_fix with pid 1369201 completed with status 0
2.00/1.08	% Result found by lpo1_fix
2.00/1.08	% Preprocessing class: HSLMSMSSLLLCHSA.
2.00/1.08	% Scheduled 6 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
2.00/1.08	% Starting lpo1_fix with 540s (3) cores
2.00/1.08	% (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
2.00/1.08	% No SInE strategy applied
2.00/1.08	% Search class: HGHSM-FSLM32-MHSMMSBN
2.00/1.08	% Scheduled 11 strats onto 3 cores with 540 seconds (540 total)
2.00/1.08	% Starting SubtermCWHack with 55s (1) cores
2.00/1.08	% Starting full_lambda_5 with 50s (1) cores
2.00/1.08	% Starting new_ho_6 with 50s (1) cores
2.00/1.08	% new_ho_6 with pid 1369210 completed with status 0
2.00/1.08	% Result found by new_ho_6
2.00/1.08	% Preprocessing class: HSLMSMSSLLLCHSA.
2.00/1.08	% Scheduled 6 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
2.00/1.08	% Starting lpo1_fix with 540s (3) cores
2.00/1.08	% (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
2.00/1.08	% No SInE strategy applied
2.00/1.08	% Search class: HGHSM-FSLM32-MHSMMSBN
2.00/1.08	% Scheduled 11 strats onto 3 cores with 540 seconds (540 total)
2.00/1.08	% Starting SubtermCWHack with 55s (1) cores
2.00/1.08	% Starting full_lambda_5 with 50s (1) cores
2.00/1.08	% Starting new_ho_6 with 50s (1) cores
2.00/1.08	% Preprocessing time       : 0.013 s
2.00/1.08	
2.00/1.08	% Proof found!
2.00/1.08	% SZS status Theorem
2.00/1.08	% SZS output start CNFRefutation
2.00/1.08	thf(decl_23, type, is_of: $i > ($i > $o) > $o).
2.00/1.08	thf(decl_24, type, all_of: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o).
2.00/1.08	thf(decl_26, type, in: $i > $i > $o).
2.00/1.08	thf(decl_62, type, imp: $o > $o > $o).
2.00/1.08	thf(decl_63, type, d_not: $o > $o).
2.00/1.08	thf(decl_72, type, non: $i > ($i > $o) > $i > $o).
2.00/1.08	thf(decl_73, type, l_some: $i > ($i > $o) > $o).
2.00/1.08	thf(decl_78, type, e_is: $i > $i > $i > $o).
2.00/1.08	thf(decl_124, type, nat: $i).
2.00/1.08	thf(decl_125, type, n_is: $i > $i > $o).
2.00/1.08	thf(decl_128, type, n_some: ($i > $o) > $o).
2.00/1.08	thf(decl_143, type, n_pl: $i > $i > $i).
2.00/1.08	thf(decl_148, type, diffprop: $i > $i > $i > $o).
2.00/1.08	thf(decl_150, type, iii: $i > $i > $o).
2.00/1.08	thf(decl_195, type, esk38_0: $i).
2.00/1.08	thf(decl_196, type, esk39_0: $i).
2.00/1.08	thf(decl_197, type, esk40_0: $i).
2.00/1.08	thf(decl_198, type, esk41_0: $i).
2.00/1.08	thf(def_d_not, axiom, ((d_not)=(^[X36:$o]:((imp @ ((X36)) @ (~($true)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.NwdA2qfTXN/E---3.1_1369188.p', def_d_not)).
2.00/1.08	thf(def_imp, axiom, ((imp)=(^[X34:$o, X35:$o]:((((X34))=>((X35)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.NwdA2qfTXN/E---3.1_1369188.p', def_imp)).
2.00/1.08	thf(def_all_of, axiom, ((all_of)=(^[X3:$i > $o, X2:$i > $o]:(![X4:$i]:((((is_of @ X4 @ X3))=>((X2 @ X4))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.NwdA2qfTXN/E---3.1_1369188.p', def_all_of)).
2.00/1.08	thf(def_is_of, axiom, ((is_of)=(^[X1:$i, X2:$i > $o]:((X2 @ X1)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.NwdA2qfTXN/E---3.1_1369188.p', def_is_of)).
2.00/1.08	thf(def_non, axiom, ((non)=(^[X1:$i, X2:$i > $o, X4:$i]:((d_not @ ((X2 @ X4)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.NwdA2qfTXN/E---3.1_1369188.p', def_non)).
2.00/1.08	thf(def_l_some, axiom, ((l_some)=(^[X1:$i, X2:$i > $o]:((d_not @ ((all_of @ (^[X4:$i]:((in @ X4 @ X1))) @ (non @ X1 @ X2))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.NwdA2qfTXN/E---3.1_1369188.p', def_l_some)).
2.00/1.08	thf(def_e_is, axiom, ((e_is)=(^[X1:$i, X60:$i, X61:$i]:(((X60)=(X61))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.NwdA2qfTXN/E---3.1_1369188.p', def_e_is)).
2.00/1.08	thf(def_diffprop, axiom, ((diffprop)=(^[X1:$i, X183:$i, X4:$i]:((n_is @ X1 @ (n_pl @ X183 @ X4))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.NwdA2qfTXN/E---3.1_1369188.p', def_diffprop)).
2.00/1.08	thf(def_n_is, axiom, ((n_is)=(^[Z0:$i, Z1:$i]:(((Z0)=(Z1))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.NwdA2qfTXN/E---3.1_1369188.p', def_n_is)).
2.00/1.08	thf(def_iii, axiom, ((iii)=(^[X1:$i, X185:$i]:((n_some @ (diffprop @ X185 @ X1))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.NwdA2qfTXN/E---3.1_1369188.p', def_iii)).
2.00/1.08	thf(def_n_some, axiom, ((n_some)=(^[Z0:$i > $o]:(((((((![X445:$i]:((((((in @ X445 @ nat))))=>((((((((Z0 @ X445))))=>((~($true)))))))))))))=>((~($true)))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.NwdA2qfTXN/E---3.1_1369188.p', def_n_some)).
2.00/1.08	thf(satz19c, conjecture, (all_of @ (^[X1:$i]:((in @ X1 @ nat))) @ (^[X1:$i]:((all_of @ (^[X217:$i]:((in @ X217 @ nat))) @ (^[X218:$i]:((all_of @ (^[X4:$i]:((in @ X4 @ nat))) @ (^[X4:$i]:((((iii @ (n_pl @ X1 @ X4) @ (n_pl @ X218 @ X4)))<=((iii @ X1 @ X218)))))))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.NwdA2qfTXN/E---3.1_1369188.p', satz19c)).
2.00/1.08	thf(satz5, axiom, (all_of @ (^[X1:$i]:((in @ X1 @ nat))) @ (^[X1:$i]:((all_of @ (^[X196:$i]:((in @ X196 @ nat))) @ (^[X197:$i]:((all_of @ (^[X4:$i]:((in @ X4 @ nat))) @ (^[X4:$i]:((n_is @ (n_pl @ (n_pl @ X1 @ X197) @ X4) @ (n_pl @ X1 @ (n_pl @ X197 @ X4)))))))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.NwdA2qfTXN/E---3.1_1369188.p', satz5)).
2.00/1.08	thf(satz6, axiom, (all_of @ (^[X1:$i]:((in @ X1 @ nat))) @ (^[X1:$i]:((all_of @ (^[X247:$i]:((in @ X247 @ nat))) @ (^[X248:$i]:((n_is @ (n_pl @ X1 @ X248) @ (n_pl @ X248 @ X1)))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.NwdA2qfTXN/E---3.1_1369188.p', satz6)).
2.00/1.08	thf(c_0_14, plain, ((d_not)=(^[Z0:$o]:((((((Z0)))=>((~($true)))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_d_not])).
2.00/1.08	thf(c_0_15, plain, ((imp)=(^[Z0:$o, Z1:$o]:((((Z0))=>((Z1)))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_imp])).
2.00/1.08	thf(c_0_16, plain, ((all_of)=(^[Z0:$i > $o, Z1:$i > $o]:(![X4:$i]:(((((Z0 @ X4)))=>((Z1 @ X4))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_all_of])).
2.00/1.08	thf(c_0_17, plain, ((is_of)=(^[Z0:$i, Z1:$i > $o]:((Z1 @ Z0)))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_is_of])).
2.00/1.08	thf(c_0_18, plain, ((non)=(^[Z0:$i, Z1:$i > $o, Z2:$i]:(((((((Z1 @ Z2))))=>((~($true)))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_non])).
2.00/1.08	thf(c_0_19, plain, ((d_not)=(^[Z0:$o]:((((((Z0)))=>((~($true)))))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_14, c_0_15])).
2.00/1.08	thf(c_0_20, plain, ((l_some)=(^[Z0:$i, Z1:$i > $o]:(((((((![X418:$i]:((((((in @ X418 @ Z0))))=>((((((((Z1 @ X418))))=>((~($true)))))))))))))=>((~($true)))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_l_some])).
2.00/1.08	thf(c_0_21, plain, ((all_of)=(^[Z0:$i > $o, Z1:$i > $o]:(![X4:$i]:(((((Z0 @ X4)))=>((Z1 @ X4))))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_16, c_0_17])).
2.00/1.08	thf(c_0_22, plain, ((non)=(^[Z0:$i, Z1:$i > $o, Z2:$i]:(((((((Z1 @ Z2))))=>((~($true)))))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_18, c_0_19])).
2.00/1.08	thf(c_0_23, plain, ((e_is)=(^[Z0:$i, Z1:$i, Z2:$i]:(((Z1)=(Z2))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_e_is])).
2.00/1.08	thf(c_0_24, plain, ((l_some)=(^[Z0:$i, Z1:$i > $o]:(((((((![X418:$i]:((((((in @ X418 @ Z0))))=>((((((((Z1 @ X418))))=>((~($true)))))))))))))=>((~($true)))))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_20, c_0_21]), c_0_19]), c_0_22])).
2.00/1.08	thf(c_0_25, plain, ((diffprop)=(^[Z0:$i, Z1:$i, Z2:$i]:((((Z0)=(n_pl @ Z1 @ Z2)))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_diffprop])).
2.00/1.08	thf(c_0_26, axiom, ((n_is)=(^[Z0:$i, Z1:$i]:(((Z0)=(Z1))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[def_n_is, c_0_23])).
2.00/1.08	thf(c_0_27, plain, ((iii)=(^[Z0:$i, Z1:$i]:(((((((![X457:$i]:((((((in @ X457 @ nat))))=>(((((((((((Z1)=(n_pl @ Z0 @ X457)))))))=>((~($true)))))))))))))=>((~($true)))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_iii])).
2.00/1.08	thf(c_0_28, axiom, ((n_some)=(^[Z0:$i > $o]:(((((((![X445:$i]:((((((in @ X445 @ nat))))=>((((((((Z0 @ X445))))=>((~($true)))))))))))))=>((~($true)))))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[def_n_some, c_0_24])).
2.00/1.08	thf(c_0_29, plain, ((diffprop)=(^[Z0:$i, Z1:$i, Z2:$i]:((((Z0)=(n_pl @ Z1 @ Z2)))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_25, c_0_26])).
2.00/1.08	thf(c_0_30, negated_conjecture, ~((all_of @ (^[X1:$i]:((in @ X1 @ nat))) @ (^[X1:$i]:((all_of @ (^[X217:$i]:((in @ X217 @ nat))) @ (^[X218:$i]:((all_of @ (^[X4:$i]:((in @ X4 @ nat))) @ (^[X4:$i]:((((iii @ (n_pl @ X1 @ X4) @ (n_pl @ X218 @ X4)))<=((iii @ X1 @ X218))))))))))))), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[satz19c])).
2.00/1.08	thf(c_0_31, plain, ((iii)=(^[Z0:$i, Z1:$i]:(((((((![X457:$i]:((((((in @ X457 @ nat))))=>(((((((((((Z1)=(n_pl @ Z0 @ X457)))))))=>((~($true)))))))))))))=>((~($true)))))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_27, c_0_28]), c_0_29])).
2.00/1.08	thf(c_0_32, negated_conjecture, ~(![X604:$i]:(((in @ X604 @ nat)=>![X603:$i]:(((in @ X603 @ nat)=>![X602:$i]:(((in @ X602 @ nat)=>((![X601:$i]:(((in @ X601 @ nat)=>(((X603)=(n_pl @ X604 @ X601))=>~($true))))=>~($true))=>(![X600:$i]:(((in @ X600 @ nat)=>(((n_pl @ X603 @ X602)=(n_pl @ (n_pl @ X604 @ X602) @ X600))=>~($true))))=>~($true)))))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_30]), c_0_21]), c_0_31])])).
2.00/1.08	thf(c_0_33, negated_conjecture, ![X1235:$i]:(((in @ esk38_0 @ nat)&((in @ esk39_0 @ nat)&((in @ esk40_0 @ nat)&((((in @ esk41_0 @ nat)|~($true))&((((esk39_0)=(n_pl @ esk38_0 @ esk41_0))|~($true))&(($true)|~($true))))&((~(in @ X1235 @ nat)|(((n_pl @ esk39_0 @ esk40_0)!=(n_pl @ (n_pl @ esk38_0 @ esk40_0) @ X1235))|~($true)))&($true))))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_32])])])])])])).
2.00/1.08	thf(c_0_34, plain, ![X561:$i]:(((in @ X561 @ nat)=>![X560:$i]:(((in @ X560 @ nat)=>![X559:$i]:(((in @ X559 @ nat)=>((n_pl @ (n_pl @ X561 @ X560) @ X559)=(n_pl @ X561 @ (n_pl @ X560 @ X559))))))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[satz5]), c_0_21]), c_0_26])).
2.00/1.08	thf(c_0_35, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i]:((~((in @ X1 @ nat))|((n_pl @ esk39_0 @ esk40_0)!=(n_pl @ (n_pl @ esk38_0 @ esk40_0) @ X1))|~(($true)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_33])).
2.00/1.08	thf(c_0_36, plain, ![X1182:$i, X1183:$i, X1184:$i]:((~(in @ X1182 @ nat)|(~(in @ X1183 @ nat)|(~(in @ X1184 @ nat)|((n_pl @ (n_pl @ X1182 @ X1183) @ X1184)=(n_pl @ X1182 @ (n_pl @ X1183 @ X1184))))))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_34])])])])).
2.00/1.08	thf(c_0_37, plain, ![X670:$i]:(((in @ X670 @ nat)=>![X669:$i]:(((in @ X669 @ nat)=>((n_pl @ X670 @ X669)=(n_pl @ X669 @ X670)))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[satz6]), c_0_21]), c_0_26])).
2.00/1.08	thf(c_0_38, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i]:((((n_pl @ esk39_0 @ esk40_0)!=(n_pl @ (n_pl @ esk38_0 @ esk40_0) @ X1))|~((in @ X1 @ nat)))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_35])).
2.00/1.08	thf(c_0_39, plain, ![X1:$i, X4:$i, X5:$i]:((((n_pl @ (n_pl @ X1 @ X4) @ X5)=(n_pl @ X1 @ (n_pl @ X4 @ X5)))|~((in @ X1 @ nat))|~((in @ X4 @ nat))|~((in @ X5 @ nat)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_36])).
2.00/1.08	thf(c_0_40, negated_conjecture, (in @ esk40_0 @ nat), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_33])).
2.00/1.08	thf(c_0_41, negated_conjecture, (in @ esk38_0 @ nat), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_33])).
2.00/1.08	thf(c_0_42, plain, ![X1304:$i, X1305:$i]:((~(in @ X1304 @ nat)|(~(in @ X1305 @ nat)|((n_pl @ X1304 @ X1305)=(n_pl @ X1305 @ X1304))))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_37])])])])).
2.00/1.08	thf(c_0_43, negated_conjecture, (((esk39_0)=(n_pl @ esk38_0 @ esk41_0))|~(($true))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_33])).
2.00/1.08	thf(c_0_44, negated_conjecture, ((in @ esk41_0 @ nat)|~(($true))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_33])).
2.00/1.08	thf(c_0_45, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i]:((((n_pl @ esk38_0 @ (n_pl @ esk40_0 @ X1))!=(n_pl @ esk39_0 @ esk40_0))|~((in @ X1 @ nat)))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38, c_0_39]), c_0_40]), c_0_41])])).
2.00/1.08	thf(c_0_46, plain, ![X1:$i, X4:$i]:((((n_pl @ X1 @ X4)=(n_pl @ X4 @ X1))|~((in @ X1 @ nat))|~((in @ X4 @ nat)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_42])).
2.00/1.08	thf(c_0_47, negated_conjecture, ((esk39_0)=(n_pl @ esk38_0 @ esk41_0)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_43])).
2.00/1.08	thf(c_0_48, negated_conjecture, (in @ esk41_0 @ nat), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_44])).
2.00/1.08	thf(c_0_49, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i]:((((n_pl @ esk38_0 @ (n_pl @ X1 @ esk40_0))!=(n_pl @ esk39_0 @ esk40_0))|~((in @ X1 @ nat)))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_45, c_0_46]), c_0_40])])).
2.00/1.08	thf(c_0_50, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i]:((((n_pl @ esk38_0 @ (n_pl @ esk41_0 @ X1))=(n_pl @ esk39_0 @ X1))|~((in @ X1 @ nat)))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39, c_0_47]), c_0_48]), c_0_41])])).
2.00/1.08	thf(c_0_51, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_49, c_0_50]), c_0_48]), c_0_40])]), ['proof']).
2.00/1.08	% SZS output end CNFRefutation
2.00/1.08	% Parsed axioms                        : 371
2.00/1.08	% Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
2.00/1.08	% Initial clauses                      : 877
2.00/1.08	% Removed in clause preprocessing      : 494
2.00/1.08	% Initial clauses in saturation        : 383
2.00/1.08	% Processed clauses                    : 1526
2.00/1.08	% ...of these trivial                  : 76
2.00/1.08	% ...subsumed                          : 562
2.00/1.08	% ...remaining for further processing  : 888
2.00/1.08	% Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 213
2.00/1.08	% Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
2.00/1.08	% Backward-subsumed                    : 24
2.00/1.08	% Backward-rewritten                   : 53
2.00/1.08	% Generated clauses                    : 10990
2.00/1.08	% ...of the previous two non-redundant : 10498
2.00/1.08	% ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
2.00/1.08	% Contextual simplify-reflections      : 11
2.00/1.08	% Paramodulations                      : 10704
2.00/1.08	% Factorizations                       : 2
2.00/1.08	% NegExts                              : 0
2.00/1.08	% Equation resolutions                 : 269
2.00/1.08	% Disequality decompositions           : 0
2.00/1.08	% Total rewrite steps                  : 2228
2.00/1.08	% ...of those cached                   : 2074
2.00/1.08	% Propositional unsat checks           : 1
2.00/1.08	%    Propositional check models        : 1
2.00/1.08	%    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
2.00/1.08	%    Propositional clauses             : 0
2.00/1.08	%    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
2.00/1.08	%    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
2.00/1.08	%    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
2.00/1.08	%    Propositional encoding time       : 0.015
2.00/1.08	%    Propositional solver time         : 0.008
2.00/1.08	%    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
2.00/1.08	%    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
2.00/1.08	%    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
2.00/1.08	% Current number of processed clauses  : 794
2.00/1.08	%    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 151
2.00/1.08	%    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
2.00/1.08	%    Negative unit clauses             : 45
2.00/1.08	%    Non-unit-clauses                  : 597
2.00/1.08	% Current number of unprocessed clauses: 9197
2.00/1.08	% ...number of literals in the above   : 33998
2.00/1.08	% Current number of archived formulas  : 0
2.00/1.08	% Current number of archived clauses   : 77
2.00/1.08	% Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 58676
2.00/1.08	% Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 25723
2.00/1.08	% Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 347
2.00/1.08	% Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3594
2.00/1.08	% Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
2.00/1.08	% BW rewrite match attempts            : 43
2.00/1.08	% BW rewrite match successes           : 14
2.00/1.08	% Condensation attempts                : 1526
2.00/1.08	% Condensation successes               : 3
2.00/1.08	% Termbank termtop insertions          : 317151
2.00/1.08	% Search garbage collected termcells   : 30895
2.00/1.08	
2.00/1.08	% -------------------------------------------------
2.00/1.08	% User time                : 0.374 s
2.00/1.08	% System time              : 0.029 s
2.00/1.08	% Total time               : 0.402 s
2.00/1.08	% Maximum resident set size: 8560 pages
2.00/1.08	
2.00/1.08	% -------------------------------------------------
2.00/1.08	% User time                : 1.050 s
2.00/1.08	% System time              : 0.081 s
2.00/1.08	% Total time               : 1.131 s
2.00/1.08	% Maximum resident set size: 5376 pages
2.00/1.08	% E exiting
2.00/1.09	EOF